Man's best friend might actually belong to a woman.
In a cross-cultural analysis, Washington State University
researchers found several factors may have played a role in building
the mutually beneficial relationship between humans and dogs,
including temperature, hunting and surprisingly -- gender. "We found
that dogs' relationships with women might have had a greater impact
on the dog-human bond than relationships with men," said Jaime
Chambers, a WSU anthropology Ph.D. student and first author on the
paper published in the Journal of Ethnobiology. "Humans were more
likely to regard dogs as a type of person if the dogs had a special
relationship with women. They were more likely to be included in
family life, treated as subjects of affection and generally, people
had greater regard for them." While dogs are the oldest, most
widespread domesticated animal, very few anthropologic studies have
directly focused on the human relationship with canines.
Yet when the WSU researchers searched the extensive collection
of ethnographic documents in the Human Relations Area Files
database, they found thousands of mentions of dogs. Ultimately, they
located data from more than 844 ethnographers writing on 144
traditional.
Looking at these cultures can provide insight into how the dog-human
relationship developed, Chambers said. "Our modern society is like a
blip in the timeline of human history," she said. "The truth is that
human-dog relationships have not looked like they do in Western
industrialized societies for most of human history, and looking at
traditional societies can offer a wider vision." The researchers
noted specific instances that showed dogs' utility, or usefulness,
to humans, and humans' utility to dogs as well as the "personhood"
of dogs -- when canines were treated like people, such as being
given names, allowed to sleep in the same beds or mourned when they
died. A pattern emerged that showed when women were more involved
with dogs, the humans' utility to dogs went up, as did the dogs'
personhood. Another prevalent trend involved the environment: the
warmer the overall climate, the less useful dogs tended to be to
humans.
"Relative to humans, dogs are really not particularly energy
efficient," said Robert Quinlan, WSU anthropology professor and
corresponding author on the paper. "Their body temperature is higher
than humans, and just a bit of exercise can make them overheat on a
hot day. We saw this trend that they had less utility to humans in
warmer environments." Quinlan noted there were some exceptions to
this with a few dog-loving cultures in the tropics, but it was a
fairly consistent trend. Hunting also seemed to strengthen the
dog-human connection. In cultures that hunted with dogs, they were
more valued by their human partners: they were higher in the
measures of dogs' utility to humans and in personhood. Those values
declined, however, when food production increased whether it was
growing crops or keeping livestock. This finding seemed to go
against the commonly held perception of herding dogs working in
concert with humans,
This study adds evidence to the evolutionary theory that dogs
and humans chose each other, rather than the older theory that
humans intentionally sought out wolf pups to raise on their own.
Either way, there have been clear benefits for the dogs, Chambers
said."Dogs are everywhere humans are," she said.